Controversy Erupts After Allahabad High Court Judge’s Speech at VHP Event
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court has ignited a firestorm of criticism after delivering a politically charged speech at an event hosted by the legal cell of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) within the High Court premises. Speaking on the topic of “Uniform Civil Code: A Constitutional Necessity,” Justice Yadav’s remarks have drawn scrutiny for their perceived bias and for invoking communal sentiments.
During his address, Yadav asserted, “India will function according to the wishes of the majority living here. This is the law,” suggesting a governance model rooted in majority preference. He went further, using the term “kathmullah,” criticized for its derogatory implications against Muslims, raising alarms about the implications of such language from a sitting judge.
Justice Yadav elaborated on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), arguing against certain religious practices such as polygamy and triple talaq. He stated, “You can’t claim the right to have four wives… UCC isn’t something that VHP, RSS, or Hinduism alone advocates; it is a constitutional necessity.” His emphasis on Hindu identity evoked further controversy as he declared, “Anyone who considers this land their mother… is a Hindu,” linking national identity closely with religious affiliation.
Yadav’s praise for the upcoming Ram Mandir in Ayodhya has also fueled perceptions of a bias towards Hindu nationalism, prompting backlash across social media platforms. Critics are calling for his removal from the bench, with one user on X (formerly Twitter) stating, “Judicial work ought to be withdrawn from Justice Shekhar Yadav… such events being held in the High Court is just another step in the erosion of institutions.”
As calls for accountability continue to grow, the incident raises important questions about the impartiality expected of the judiciary in a diverse nation.